Talk to Sigil
Bring the audit, the deadline, and the stack.
We'll scope the run.
A four-field note to the founder inbox — read before scheduling, never triaged by a chatbot. Sigilis in a closed pilot cohort this quarter; if you’re shipping accessibility under a deadline, the form is the fast path.
What you get for the note
An audit-grade fix process, not a sales demo.
The same shape Sigil ships against pilot repos this quarter. Every fix is a pull request, every finding is criterion-cited, and the evidence is on the record before the merge.
PR-shaped remediation
Every fix lands as a pull request against your own branch — same review queue, same commit history, diff-per-finding with the WCAG 2.2 / EN 301 549 clause inline.
Audit-grade evidence
axe-core diagnostic trace, criterion citation, and a SHA-256 evidence hash recorded at the merge boundary — the artifacts your counsel and procurement hand to a regulator.
WCAG 2.2 · EN 301 549 · VPAT 2.x
A VPAT 2.5 ACR re-issued on every deploy; EN 301 549 mapped clause-by-clause; EN-301-549 + EAA ETA + ADA Title III language ready to copy into your questionnaire.
Immutable evidence trail
axe-core traces, AT screenshots, criterion rationale, and the diff itself converge into an unmodifiable log — readable on demand, not assembled after the fact.
Sample PR fix
The shape the diff lands in is the shape the rest of the site walks through — one finding, one PR, criterion-cited, with the axe-core diagnostic and a merge receipt attached.
Four fields · one business-day reply
Self-serve instead?
If it’s a one-team predictive scan, the pricing page has it.
Three tiers, monthly or annual, with the same deliverables your counsel and procurement hand to a regulator. The same audit-grade shape — a PR with a diff, a VPAT, and an evidence trail — just without the founder call.